Why is the northern San Andreas so quiet when its Mendocino tip is so noisy?

By David Jacobson, Temblor

Check your seismic hazard rank

mendocino-triple-junction
Offshore of Cape Mendocino lies one of the most seismically active regions in the world. The Mendocino Triple Junction marks the collision of three tectonic plates. (Photo from: thomashenthorne.com)

 

Over the last month, things have been relatively quiet on the earthquake front. While this is good for everyone’s well-being, it also lets us examine smaller trends in earthquake behavior. Today, we thought we’d focus on the absence of earthquakes along the northern portion of the San Andreas, and how it is a stark contrast to the intense activity at the Mendocino triple junction off the California Coast.

Everyone in California knows the San Andreas Fault. As it winds its way for approximately 1,300 km through California, from the Gulf of California to Cape Mendocino, it cuts near the populated centers of Los Angeles and San Francisco. In the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the entire Northern San Andreas Fault, from San Juan Bautista to the Mendocino Triple Junction ruptured. This includes a large portion of the fault which is offshore. However, since then, this section of the San Andreas has been nearly aseismic. This is despite the fact that the Northern San Andreas accommodates approximately 75% of the plate motion in Northern California. So, where is the seismicity? While some of it is seem to the east of the San Andreas, along the Maacama and Bartlett Springs faults, significant seismicity is seen to the north at the Mendocino Triple Junction.

The Mendocino Triple Junction marks the collision point of three major tectonic plates. These plates, known as the Pacific, North American, and Gorda are all moving at different rates and in different directions. It should be pointed out that the Triple Junction marks the southernmost extent of the Cascadia Subduction Zone. Because of this oblique collision, significant strain builds up, resulting in one of the most seismically active regions on earth.

In addition to earthquakes caused by the stress buildup of continental and oceanic collision, the region also saw increased stress from the 1906 earthquake. Based on coulomb stress modeling completed by Ruth Harris and Robert Simpson in 1998, the Mendocino Triple Junction lies in an area of increased stress, while the Northern San Andreas is in a stress shadow (faults on which stress was decreased). Furthermore, large earthquakes around the Mendocino Triple Junction, including a M=7.3 in 1980, have imparted additional stress.

mendocino-1980-86-quakes
This figure from Rollins and Stein, 2010 shows the location of the M=7.3 1980 earthquake at the Mendocino Triple Junction and the associated seismicity.

 

What all of this shows is that the Mendocino Triple Junction has numerous forces acting on it, all of which likely contribute to it being extremely seismically active. Additionally, the coulomb stress modeling helps explain why the Northern San Andreas has been very quiet for over 100 years. This also highlights how important it is to use more than past earthquakes to interpret seismic hazard, for if we were to only use past earthquakes, we would not see the Northern San Andreas as a hazard. However, using models such as the Global Earthquake Activity Rate (GEAR) model, which is available in Temblor and incorporates strain rates, we can see that the Mendocino Triple Junction and Northern San Andreas are significant hazards to California.

san-andreas-fault-mendocino-triple-junction-map
This Temblor map shows the Global Earthquake Activity Rate (GEAR) model for Northern California with the San Andreas Fault and Mendocino Triple Junction highlighted.

 

References
USGS

Berkeley Seismological Laboratory

Goldfinger et. al., Rupture lengths and temporal history of significant earthquakes on the offshore and north coast segments of the Northern San Andreas Fault based on turbidite stratigraphy, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 254 (2007) 9–27

John C. Rollins and Ross S. Stein, Coulomb stress interactions among M ≥ 5.9 earthquakes in the Gorda deformation zone and on the Mendocino Fault Zone, Cascadia subduction zone, and northern San Andreas Fault, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115, B12306, doi:10.1029/2009JB007117, 2010

Ruth Harris and Robert Simpson, Suppression of large earthquakes by stress shadows: A comparison of Coulomb and rate-and-state failure, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 103, NO. B10, PAGES 24,439-24,451, OCTOBER 10, 1998

  • Dal Stanley

    The SE corner of the Gorda Plate is under great stress as it is pushed under the continental margin and by the effects of the San Andreas and Barlettt Springs fault zones. Here is a contour map of the downgoing part of the Gorda that I posted on my site to show the corner character of the Gorda. There are NE trending folds offshore due to stress in a SE direction. The 1980 event is shown by the red square
    http://image.prntscr.com/image/9c5948669e3c4628a64ad2320b45bab1.png
    And the offshore zone where the 1980 M7.3 occurred is inboard of another major lineament where two M7s occurred along a line (one recordered to a M6.9) in 2005. Plotting events >M6.5 shows two lineaments in the Gorda plate where stress is mainly relieved offshore Oregon and N. Californa.
    http://image.prntscr.com/image/6102db984b604e0496acdd9ba79d6027.png