Figure 2 Coulomb stress transfer cross sections along lines indicated in Figure 1. (a) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NNE-striking, ESE-dipping nodal plane of the July magnitude-7.0 earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (b) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NE-striking, SE-dipping nodal plane of the magnitude-6.4 October earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (c) Section passing through both the July and October, 2022 earthquakes, showing the fault mechanism solutions of both mainshocks and their aftershocks (small circles). Coulomb stress transfer and aftershock color codes same as in Figure 1. See text for discussion. References: Jarvis et al., 2008 for SRTM topography; Weatherall et al., 2020 for bathymetry; Toda et al., 2011 for CST modeling; PHIVOLCS for earthquake data. GMT (Wessel and Smith, 1995) was used to generate the cross section. See text for more discussion. Credit: Aurelio, Catugas, Ramirez, Aurelio, Lagmay.

Posted on by

Figure 2 Coulomb stress transfer cross sections along lines indicated in Figure 1. (a) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NNE-striking, ESE-dipping nodal plane of the July magnitude-7.0 earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (b) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NE-striking, SE-dipping nodal plane of the magnitude-6.4 October earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (c) Section passing through both the July and October, 2022 earthquakes, showing the fault mechanism solutions of both mainshocks and their aftershocks (small circles). Coulomb stress transfer and aftershock color codes same as in Figure 1. See text for discussion. References: Jarvis et al., 2008 for SRTM topography; Weatherall et al., 2020 for bathymetry; Toda et al., 2011 for CST modeling; PHIVOLCS for earthquake data. GMT (Wessel and Smith, 1995) was used to generate the cross section. See text for more discussion. Credit: Aurelio, Catugas, Ramirez, Aurelio, Lagmay.

Figure 2 Coulomb stress transfer cross sections along lines indicated in Figure 1. (a) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NNE-striking, ESE-dipping nodal plane of the July magnitude-7.0 earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (b) Section drawn perpendicular to and passing through the NE-striking, SE-dipping nodal plane of the magnitude-6.4 October earthquake, showing the fault mechanism solutions of the mainshock and the aftershocks (small circles); (c) Section passing through both the July and October, 2022 earthquakes, showing the fault mechanism solutions of both mainshocks and their aftershocks (small circles). Coulomb stress transfer and aftershock color codes same as in Figure 1. See text for discussion. References: Jarvis et al., 2008 for SRTM topography; Weatherall et al., 2020 for bathymetry; Toda et al., 2011 for CST modeling; PHIVOLCS for earthquake data. GMT (Wessel and Smith, 1995) was used to generate the cross section. See text for more discussion. Credit: Aurelio, Catugas, Ramirez, Aurelio, Lagmay.

Latest posts by Krystal Vasquez (see all)