Italy Earthquakes after today’s M=6.6: What’s next?

Ross Stein, Volkan Sevilgen, and David Jacobson, Temblor (Updated: 1 November 2016)

The Central Italy earthquakes are unfolding into an extended progressive sequence. Certainly since 24 August 2016, and perhaps even since the 2009 M=6.2 L’Aquila event, earthquakes have been rupturing in a chaotic northward-propagating falling domino pattern.


Is this a falling domino sequence? Well, not quite, but close.


The shock strikes an evacuated region, sparing thousands of lives

If there is any silver lining to this relentless and traumatic sequence, it is that the Amatrice earthquake and its aftershocks led to the widespread evacuation of the region, and so today’s M=6.6 earthquake miraculously took no lives (as reported at the time of this post). Had the same quake struck without being preceded by numerous smaller quakes, the death toll would likely have been in the thousands. A sobering comparison is the 1915 M=6.7 Avezzano earthquake 100 km to the southeast, which killed 32,000 people, and the 1980 M=6.9 Irpinia shock, 250 km to the southeast, which killed 2,483 people. Of course, if all the world’s quakes behaved this way, we would be living on a kinder, gentler planet. But far more common are long stretches of seismic quiet punctuated by large quakes followed by smaller and less frequent ones. These quakes catch us all unawares, and so are lethal.

USGS ’Did You Feel It?’ results
USGS ’Did You Feel It?’ results
It is further important that the Grand Risks Commission (the Italian National Commission for the Forecast and Prevention of Major Risks, impaneled by the Italian Department of Civil Defense) issued a public statement on 28 October, warning of the possibility of more and larger (M=6-7) earthquakes.


Smoking Gun: Classic Active Faults

Although many of Italy’s extensional faults are so young that there is frustratingly little evidence for geologists to map at the surface. They are called ‘blind faults,’ because the geologists are blind to their presence. But the faults near Norcia are an exception: They are remarkably clear and well developed features. Although uncertain, these faults probably last ruptured in 1703. One sees a landscape (below) very similar to the U.S. Basin and Range province of Nevada and Utah, which is also strewn with active extensional faults.


The features of extensional (‘normal’) faults are evident in the epicentral region. Repeated earthquakes have likely pushed down the basin in which Norcia sits, and uplifted the range in which Castelluccio is nestled. Wineglass valleys are unique to extensional fault-sculpted landscapes, and the giant landslide above Castelvecchio was probably triggered by a past Preci or Campi Fault quake. These faults are schematically shown by Galadini and Galli (2000).


Stressed faults continue to rupture, and they in turn change the stress

Thanks to insight from Michael Blanpied at the USGS and Francesca Cinti at the INGV, we now know that it was the Vettore-Bove Fault that ruptured. Photographs taken after the quake revealed a surface rupture 12 km (7.5 mi) east of Norcia (See photo below). This surface rupture was not surprising given that 50-100 cm of slip is reasonable for a M=6.6 earthquake. It is also possible that from this shock, stress has been transferred southwest onto the Norica Fault, which is now in play. One might ask why the epicenter lies 12-13 km west of the Vettore-Bove fault, and we don’t have a good answer. The epicenter should lie perhaps 5-6 km to the west, since the fault surface is itself inclined (‘dipping to’) the west, but not as far as it would appear right now.

Surface rupture along the Vettore-Bove Fault caused by the 30 October 2016 M=6.6 earthquake. (Photo courtesy of Paolo Galli)


Here is the figure we published on 26 October, revised to show the 24 hours of new mainshocks and aftershocks (left) following the 30 October earthquake. The 30 October 2016 shock struck on the Vettore-Bove fault, which, according to the INGV, was brought closer to failure by the 24 August 2016 M=6.2 shock (right).
Here is the figure we published on 26 October, revised to show the past 24 hours of new mainshocks and aftershocks following the 30 October earthquake (left). The 30 October 2016 shock struck on the Vetorre-Bove Fault, which, according to the INGV, was brought closer to failure by the 24 August 2016 M=6.2 shock (right).


In our judgment, the Norcia, Gorzano, Capitignano Faults could now be the next domino pieces to fall.



F. Galadini and P. Galli (2000), Active Tectonics in the Central Apennines (Italy) – Input Data for Seismic Hazard Assessment, Natural Hazards, 22, 225–270.

DISS Working Group and INGV, Database of Individual Seismic Sources (v.3)— A compilation of potential sources for earthquakes of M≥5.5 in Italy and the surrounding regions,


  • Mac McCarthy

    Africa continues to crash into Europe! Geology doesn’t stop…

  • Dal Stanley
  • Seth Stein

    Nice post and images! In general terms, about a million years ago Italy started splitting along the Apennines, with the part to the east now part of the Adria microplate, moving away from the part to the west, which is essentially part of Eurasia. This 1-2 mm/yr motion – about the same as the Basin and Range – shows up nicely in GPS data as well as earthquake mechanisms. One model for how this arises is

    Stein, S. and G. Sella, Pleistocene change from convergence to extension in the Apennines as a consequence of Adria microplate motion, in The Adria Microplate: GPS Geodesy, Tectonics and Hazards, Nato Science Series, 21-34, edited by Pinter, N., G. Grenerczy, J. Weber, S. Stein, and D. Medak, Springer, 2005

    • Ross Stein

      For those who do not know, Seth Stein (no relation) is the distinguished Northwestern University seismologist who has worked extensively on plate motions, and on seismic risk.